Current:Home > InvestWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -Keystone Capital Education
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-18 20:03:26
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (3169)
Related
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Stop lying to your children about death. Why you need to tell them the truth.
- Rescuers race against the clock as sea turtles recover after freezing temperatures
- Georgia senators vote for board to oversee secretary of state despite constitutional questions
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Golf phenom Nick Dunlap talks about going pro: It was the easiest, hardest decision I've ever had to make
- Luka Doncic lights up Hawks for 73 points, tied for fourth-most in one game in NBA history
- Gwendoline Christie Transforms Into a Porcelain Doll for Maison Margiela's Paris Fashion Week Show
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Inflation slowed further in December as an economic ‘soft landing’ moves into sharper focus
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Nursing home employee accused of attempting to rape 87-year-old woman with dementia
- Family of Ricky Cobb II says justice is within reach following Minnesota trooper’s murder charge
- NBA announces All-Star Game starters; LeBron James earns 20th straight nod
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Rescues at sea, and how to make a fortune
- Egyptian soccer officials sacrifice cow for better fortune at Africa Cup
- A landslide of contaminated soil threatens environmental disaster in Denmark. Who pays to stop it?
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Dope ropes, THC Doritos reflect our patchwork pot laws and kids can pay the price, experts say
A day after Trump testifies, lawyers have final say in E. Jean Carroll defamation trial
Remains found on serial killer's Indiana estate identified as man missing since 1993
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
Man accused of picking up teen fugitive following escape now facing charges, authorities say
Atlanta Falcons hiring Raheem Morris as next head coach
Covering child care costs for daycare workers could fix Nebraska’s provider shortage, senator says